Skip to content

2 Comments

  1. Dave Timoney
    @

    Ade, I think that business expertise (of which e-skills is a subset) needs more understanding of the scientific method, not less.
    Having been trained as an historian, I should point out that I think very few holders of an IT degree really understand the empirical approach, so this is not about having a certificate of propellor-headedness.
    As a CIO, I am only too well aware that techy skills out of context are largely useless to business, and that what you need is to ally this with process and people insight; however, I also know that good business analysis is data-driven and good decision-making is evidence-based.
    Most business decisions display a degree of intellectual rigour little better than voodoo.
    As the old saw has it: “success is 10% inspiration and 90% perspiration.” Most of that sweat is down to the hard yards of testing, data-gathering and more testing.
    I agree with you that this is a PR issue. IT needs to convince the business that it is an authority in method, not just the utility guy.

    Reply

  2. Ade McCormack
    @

    Great counter argument Dave. And given our very different academic backgrounds it is not surprising we see the situation from opposite sides.
    I agree with your comment about IT degrees, which generally prepare students to be IT lecturers / research scientists, rather than industry-ready professionals.
    My experience of mathematical scientists is that they have to be completely overhauled to be industry-ready as their self taught programming skills lead to software that is both clever and unmaintainable.
    I guess I am making the case for a more socially rounded individual. But recognise by your argument that if we swing in the opposite direction we will lose what little intellectual rigour we have today.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *